임프란트 보철의 유지형태에 따른 분류 및 비교 part I: 나사 유지형 보철과 시멘트 유지형 보철

정재헌; 손미경

SITE LINK

임프란트 보철의 유지형태에 따른 분류 및 비교 part I: 나사 유지형 보철과 시멘트 유지형 보철
The Classification and Comparison of Implant Prosthesis according to Types of Retention. Part I: Screw Retained Prosthesis vs Cement Retained Prosthesis

대한구강악안면임플란트학회지 2010년 14권 2호 p.138 ~ 151

정재헌, 손미경,

소속 상세정보

정재헌 ( Chung Chae-Heon ) - 조선대학교 치의학전문대학원 보철학교실
손미경 ( Son Mee-Kyung ) - 조선대학교 치의학전문대학원 보철학교실

KMID : 0602720100140020138

Abstract

The retaining methods of implant prostheses can be divided into screw-retained and cement-retained types. Screwretained prosthesis have many advantages, such as retrievability, better retention for reduced interocclusal spaces and easy repair, while their disadvantages include the possibility of screw loosening, relatively high cost, technique sensitivity and difficulty of achieving passive fit. In comparison, cement-retained prosthesis provides good esthetic, passivity and occlusal benefit because no screw holes are involved; however, they are difficult to retrieve. To combine the advantages of both types of prosthesis, screw and cement-retained implant prostheses (SCP) have been introduced. In Part I of this article, the advantages, disadvantages, ideal placement position, impression techniques and occlusal considerations of screw-retained and cement-retained prosthesis are discussed and SCP methods are introduced in Part II.